Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to trivago N.V.
How trivago N.V. stacks up
TRVG · against 102 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Profitability
33/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #52 of 103 · scores higher than 49% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score16 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including TRVG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 33?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its operating margin and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 78% of peers. Operating margin: 0.3% vs peer median 8.2%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 70% of peers. Return on invested capital: 1.5% vs peer median 6.0%
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 3.1% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TRVG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TRVG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 95 reported | 1.5% | 1.9% | 46% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 103 reported | 0.3% | 2.8% | 38% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 99 reported | 3.1% | 1.4% | 67% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 94 reported | 6.7% | 1.4% | 71% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 103 reported | 96.0% | 40.7% | 97% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TRVG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.9B TWD (≈$244M) | 99 | 73 | |
| 2 | 2.5B HKD (≈$316M) | 96 | 70 | |
| 2 | 47.1B JPY (≈$320M) | 96 | 85 | |
| 4 | 20.2B JPY (≈$137M) | 94 | 69 | |
| 4 | 19.5B JPY (≈$133M) | 94 | 71 | |
| 49 | 22.4B JPY (≈$152M) | 35 | 62 | |
| 49 | 285M GBP (≈$370M) | 35 | 30 | |
| 49 | 286M CAD (≈$209M) | 35 | 52 | |
| 52 | 303M USD | 33 | 34 | |
| 52 | 248M USD | 33 | 58 | |
| 54 | 3.3B CNY (≈$457M) | 32 | 38 | |
| 54 | 239M AUD (≈$158M) | 32 | 52 | |
| 56 | 174.5B KRW (≈$126M) | 31 | 54 | |
| 56 | 297M USD | 31 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score