Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TRST · against 266 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #198 of 267 · scores higher than 25% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score32 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including TRST · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield and book yield, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | TRST | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 271 reported | 6.3% | 8.3% | 26% | 60% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 52 reported | Not reported | 10.6% | — | — | Context only |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 162 reported | 6.1% | 8.0% | 34% | Context only | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 268 reported | 67.1% | 81.2% | 30% | 40% |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.2B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 6.0B HKD (≈$762M) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 20.6B TWD (≈$638M) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 13.7B HKD (≈$1.8B) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 12.7B HKD (≈$1.6B) | 98 | 56 | |
| 194 | 878M USD | 34 | 41 | |
| 194 | 1.0B USD | 34 | 48 | |
| 194 | 1.8B USD | 34 | 42 | |
| 198 | 1.5B USD | 33 | 46 | |
| 198 | 977M USD | 33 | 48 | |
| 198 | 2.0B CAD (≈$1.4B) | 33 | 56 | |
| 201 | 1.7B USD | 32 | 48 | |
| 201 | 1.8B USD | 32 | 13 | |
| 201 | 656M CHF (≈$754M) | 32 | 26 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score