Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to TriMas Corporation
How TriMas Corporation stacks up
TRS · against 477 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
88/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #46 of 478 · scores higher than 89% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score58 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including TRS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 88?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -0.8% vs peer median 6.1%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 64.4% vs peer median 4.4%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 66% of peers. EBITDA yield: 19.6% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TRS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TRS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 474 reported | 5.3% | 5.1% | 53% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 487 reported | 11.5% | 9.5% | 63% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 141 reported | -0.8% | 6.9% | 18% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 476 reported | 102.6% | 55.6% | 79% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TRS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 2 | 151.6B JPY (≈$1.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 6.9B HKD (≈$885M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 46 | 1.23T KRW (≈$885M) | 88 | 39 | |
| 46 | 178.8B JPY (≈$1.2B) | 88 | 75 | |
| 46 | 1.3B USD | 88 | 48 | |
| 46 | 1.7B USD | 88 | 60 | |
| 46 | 1.4B USD | 88 | 89 | |
| 53 | 129.4B JPY (≈$880M) | 87 | 52 | |
| 53 | 197.6B JPY (≈$1.3B) | 87 | 59 | |
| 53 | 77.2B THB (≈$2.2B) | 87 | 64 | |
| 53 | 1.9B USD | 87 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score