Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to TriMas Corporation
How TriMas Corporation stacks up
TRS · against 1,600 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Overall
89/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #8 of 1,601 · scores higher than 100% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the overall score55 peers with an overall score of 80–89, including TRS · Click a bar to see the companies
The four scores behind it
Overall = average of valuation, growth, profitability and safety percentile (categories without data are skipped)Ranking by overall score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TRS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Overall | Valuation | Growth | Profitability | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 96 | 97 | 100 | 0 / 2 | ||
| 2 | 1.5B BRL (≈$267M) | 92 | 80 | 99 | 99 | 0 / 2 | |
| 3 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 91 | 74 | 100 | 99 | 0 / 2 | |
| 3 | 114.1B USD | 91 | 96 | 82 | 95 | 0 / 2 | |
| 3 | 3.5B BRL (≈$638M) | 91 | 94 | 90 | 91 | 0 / 2 | |
| 6 | 404.0B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 90 | 76 | 98 | 0 / 2 | ||
| 6 | 428M USD | 90 | 97 | 83 | 88 | 0 / 2 | |
| 8 | 293M USD | 89 | 66 | 99 | 95 | 0 / 2 | |
| 8 | 1.4B USD | 89 | 88 | 96 | 77 | 0 / 2 | |
| 10 | 11.7B HKD (≈$1.5B) | 88 | 95 | 94 | 86 | 0 / 2 | |
| 10 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 88 | 99 | 77 | 80 | 0 / 2 | |
| 10 | 237M MYR (≈$52M) | 88 | 94 | 90 | 86 | 0 / 2 | |
| 10 | 38.1B JPY (≈$259M) | 88 | 96 | 98 | 60 | 0 / 2 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score