Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TRMD · against 120 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #54 of 121 · scores higher than 56% of peers · safety percentile 54
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)13 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including TRMD · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TRMD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 121 reported | 0.42× | 0.50× | 57% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 120 reported | 0.04 | 0.50 | 83% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 121 reported | 2.27× | 1.54× | 76% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 2 | 4.4B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 3 | 5.2B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 4 | 14.8B ILS (≈$4.0B) | 97 | 63 | |
| 5 | 3.2B USD | 96 | 66 | |
| 50 | 35.9B HKD (≈$4.6B) | 57 | 69 | |
| 51 | 4.3B CAD (≈$3.1B) | 56 | 59 | |
| 52 | 2.4B USD | 55 | 39 | |
| 53 | 3.8B USD | 55 | 45 | |
| 54 | 4.1B USD | 54 | 48 | |
| 55 | 135.1B THB (≈$3.8B) | 54 | 56 | |
| 56 | 25.0B NOK (≈$2.4B) | 53 | 57 | |
| 57 | 5.0B AUD (≈$3.3B) | 52 | 34 | |
| 58 | 2.9B USD | 51 | 29 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score