Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Trimble Inc.
How Trimble Inc. stacks up
TRMB · against 180 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
23/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #170 of 181 · scores higher than 6% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score12 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including TRMB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 23?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- Earnings per share turned from a profit to a loss. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.1%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 63% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 1.2% vs peer median 4.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.8% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TRMB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TRMB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 183 reported | 5.8% | 16.2% | 18% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 156 reported | -71.1% | 18.9% | 3% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 179 reported | 1.2% | 11.2% | 17% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TRMB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 2 | 835.6B TWD (≈$25.9B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 2 | 101.7B CNY (≈$14.2B) | 98 | 63 | |
| 2 | 983.8B TWD (≈$30.5B) | 98 | 65 | |
| 2 | 23.2B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 167 | 12.9B USD | 27 | 53 | |
| 168 | 8.1B USD | 25 | 55 | |
| 169 | 74.0B CNY (≈$10.4B) | 24 | 57 | |
| 170 | 3.47T JPY (≈$23.6B) | 23 | 47 | |
| 170 | 15.3B USD | 23 | 37 | |
| 172 | 7.9B USD | 22 | 16 | |
| 173 | 293.4B SEK (≈$29.3B) | 21 | 52 | |
| 174 | 339.4B TWD (≈$10.5B) | 20 | 65 | |
| 174 | 21.3B USD | 20 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score