Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TRIP · against 515 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #413 of 516 · scores higher than 20% of peers · safety percentile 26
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)45 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including TRIP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TRIP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 504 reported | 1.35× | 0.44× | 14% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 506 reported | 0.84 | 0.51 | 27% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 504 reported | 1.56× | 1.52× | 52% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 2 | 92.4B JPY (≈$628M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 4.7B CNY (≈$659M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 4 | 4.2B CNY (≈$585M) | 99 | 80 | |
| 5 | 9.10T IDR (≈$564M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 409 | 34.5B ZAR (≈$1.9B) | 27 | 54 | |
| 410 | 1.1B GBP (≈$1.4B) | 27 | 40 | |
| 411 | 1.4B USD | 26 | 19 | |
| 412 | 718M GBP (≈$934M) | 26 | 68 | |
| 413 | 1.1B USD | 26 | 55 | |
| 414 | 5.5B CNY (≈$769M) | 26 | 23 | |
| 415 | 1.3B USD | 26 | 44 | |
| 416 | 1.4B USD | 26 | 65 | |
| 417 | 159.4B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 25 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score