Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TRIN · against 99 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Ranked #58 of 100 · scores higher than 42% of peers · safety percentile 40
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)13 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including TRIN · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TRIN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 88 reported | 1.19× | 0.47× | 38% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 103 reported | 0.67 | 0.67 | 50% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 98 reported | 1.96× | 2.49× | 45% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 907M EUR (≈$998M) | 99 | ||
| 2 | 1.2B EUR (≈$1.3B) | 98 | 59 | |
| 3 | 231.2B INR (≈$2.8B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 4 | 21.21T IDR (≈$1.3B) | 97 | 93 | |
| 5 | 3.1B AUD (≈$2.1B) | 96 | 62 | |
| 54 | 1.0B USD | 42 | 48 | |
| 55 | 1.5B USD | 41 | 58 | |
| 56 | 3.37T KRW (≈$2.4B) | 41 | 26 | |
| 57 | 1.4B EUR (≈$1.5B) | 40 | 48 | |
| 58 | 1.5B USD | 40 | 59 | |
| 59 | 827M USD | 39 | 62 | |
| 60 | 1.0B USD | 39 | 20 | |
| 61 | 773M USD | 39 | 54 | |
| 62 | 798M USD | 38 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score