Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TRI · against 115 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #26 of 116 · scores higher than 78% of peers · safety percentile 56
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)12 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including TRI · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger beta, but weaker current ratio than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TRI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 111 reported | 0.29× | 0.62× | 74% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 115 reported | 0.19 | 0.87 | 94% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 115 reported | 0.51× | 1.23× | 3% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.91T JPY (≈$26.6B) | 95 | 70 | |
| 2 | 28.8B USD | 94 | 73 | |
| 3 | 60.0B USD | 92 | 71 | |
| 4 | 53.7B USD | 89 | 56 | |
| 5 | 34.8B USD | 89 | 49 | |
| 22 | 5.85T JPY (≈$39.8B) | 58 | 62 | |
| 23 | 206.3B BRL (≈$37.1B) | 58 | 62 | |
| 24 | 271.0B CNY (≈$37.9B) | 57 | 58 | |
| 25 | 65.8B USD | 57 | 60 | |
| 26 | 47.7B USD | 56 | 55 | |
| 27 | 47.2B USD | 55 | 65 | |
| 28 | 265.7B CNY (≈$37.2B) | 53 | 65 | |
| 29 | 387.5B HKD (≈$49.6B) | 53 | 48 | |
| 30 | 173.2B CNY (≈$24.2B) | 52 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score