Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to LendingTree, Inc.
How LendingTree, Inc. stacks up
TREE · against 112 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Profitability
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #31 of 113 · scores higher than 72% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score10 peers with a profitability score of 60–69, including TREE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 77% of peers. Operating margin: 7.3% vs peer median 23.5%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 72% of peers. Return on invested capital: 12.1% vs peer median 6.3%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 84% of peers. Return on assets: 7.8% vs peer median 2.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TREE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TREE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 108 reported | 12.1% | 5.3% | 80% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 57 reported | 7.3% | 19.6% | 27% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 131 reported | 7.8% | 2.7% | 86% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 128 reported | 82.8% | 5.9% | 99% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 144 reported | 96.4% | 98.7% | 48% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TREE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 342M EUR (≈$376M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 2 | 566M AUD (≈$374M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 3 | 527M AUD (≈$348M) | 97 | 64 | |
| 4 | 76.5B JPY (≈$520M) | 96 | 67 | |
| 5 | 323M EUR (≈$355M) | 93 | 59 | |
| 28 | 538M USD | 65 | 43 | |
| 28 | 465M USD | 65 | 54 | |
| 28 | 501M EUR (≈$551M) | 65 | 58 | |
| 31 | 3.6B HKD (≈$461M) | 64 | 61 | |
| 31 | 405M USD | 64 | 57 | |
| 33 | 3.1B CNY (≈$436M) | 63 | 54 | |
| 34 | 203M EUR (≈$224M) | 62 | 52 | |
| 35 | 294M CAD (≈$215M) | 61 | 49 | |
| 36 | 773M USD | 59 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score