Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Texas Pacific Land Corporation
How Texas Pacific Land Corporation stacks up
TPL · against 196 other Energy companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
100/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #1 of 197 · scores higher than 100% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score24 peers with a profitability score of 90–100, including TPL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 100?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its operating margin, return on assets and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 94% of peers. Return on invested capital: 37.3% vs peer median 9.3%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 99% of peers. Operating margin: 74.9% vs peer median 11.7%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 99% of peers. Return on assets: 29.1% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TPL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TPL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 190 reported | 37.3% | 9.2% | 97% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 193 reported | 74.9% | 13.4% | 99% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 194 reported | 29.1% | 4.4% | 98% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 190 reported | 36.6% | 11.8% | 90% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 197 reported | 93.3% | 41.2% | 98% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TPL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22.9B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 2 | 1.6B USD | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 1.3B USD | 99 | 59 | |
| 2 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 5 | 3.2B USD | 98 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score