Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TPB · against 227 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #170 of 228 · scores higher than 25% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score24 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including TPB · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its free cash flow yield, EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
| Metric | TPB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 218 reported | 3.4% | 4.6% | 36% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 229 reported | 5.3% | 9.4% | 24% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 83 reported | 1.5% | 8.8% | 16% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 215 reported | 31.9% | 55.9% | 20% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 2 | 87.0B INR (≈$1.0B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 2 | 29.73T IDR (≈$1.8B) | 98 | 60 | |
| 4 | 933M USD | 97 | 84 | |
| 5 | 945M EUR (≈$1.0B) | 96 | 60 | |
| 167 | 10.4B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 28 | 53 | |
| 167 | 9.0B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 28 | 55 | |
| 167 | 7.1B CNY (≈$989M) | 28 | 35 | |
| 170 | 6.9B CNY (≈$968M) | 27 | 31 | |
| 170 | 1.3B USD | 27 | 66 | |
| 172 | 22.2B MXN (≈$1.2B) | 26 | 27 | |
| 173 | 7.0B CNY (≈$986M) | 25 | 37 | |
| 173 | 7.5B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 25 | 48 | |
| 173 | 11.7B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 25 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score