Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Travel + Leisure Co.
How Travel + Leisure Co. stacks up
TNL · against 300 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
65/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #140 of 301 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score44 peers with a profitability score of 60–69, including TNL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 65?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its operating margin and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 3.4% vs peer median 3.3%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 62% of peers. Return on invested capital: 10.0% vs peer median 7.3%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 80% of peers. Operating margin: 13.7% vs peer median 6.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TNL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TNL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 286 reported | 10.0% | 9.9% | 51% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 301 reported | 13.7% | 9.1% | 74% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 285 reported | 3.4% | 4.4% | 33% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 272 reported | Not reported | 12.0% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 303 reported | 50.6% | 30.3% | 82% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TNL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 2 | 106.7B TWD (≈$3.3B) | 99 | 71 | |
| 2 | 4.6B USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 2 | 2.4B USD | 99 | 65 | |
| 137 | 2.5B USD | 66 | 62 | |
| 137 | 4.1B GBP (≈$5.3B) | 66 | 70 | |
| 140 | 17.6B SAR (≈$4.8B) | 65 | 68 | |
| 140 | 7.3B SGD (≈$5.5B) | 65 | 69 | |
| 140 | 4.6B USD | 65 | 39 | |
| 140 | 2.2B EUR (≈$2.4B) | 65 | 42 | |
| 144 | 706.6B JPY (≈$4.8B) | 64 | 75 | |
| 144 | 581.4B JPY (≈$4.0B) | 64 | 73 | |
| 144 | 5.9B USD | 64 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score