Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TNGX · against 272 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #208 of 273 · scores higher than 3% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score66 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including TNGX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
| Metric | TNGX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 268 reported | -3.6% | 2.5% | 20% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 268 reported | -4.6% | 4.7% | 15% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 145 reported | -3.7% | 0.9% | 28% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 267 reported | 11.7% | 27.7% | 20% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.3B HKD (≈$2.7B) | 99 | 68 | |
| 1 | 52.2B HKD (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 1 | 37.3B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 99 | 90 | |
| 1 | 40.2B MXN (≈$2.2B) | 99 | 71 | |
| 5 | 21.1B HKD (≈$2.7B) | 98 | 67 | |
| 208 | 2.0B USD | 8 | 53 | |
| 208 | 2.0B USD | 8 | 44 | |
| 208 | 5.4B USD | 8 | 24 | |
| 208 | 3.4B USD | 8 | 48 | |
| 208 | 3.9B USD | 8 | 52 | |
| 208 | 2.2B USD | 8 | 23 | |
| 208 | 2.0B USD | 8 | 42 | |
| 208 | 2.2B USD | 8 | 35 | |
| 208 | 2.8B USD | 8 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score