Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TNET · against 590 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #573 of 591 · scores higher than 3% of peers · safety percentile 4
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)49 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including TNET · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TNET | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 583 reported | 7.60× | 0.45× | 1% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 575 reported | 0.93 | 0.69 | 31% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 563 reported | 1.13× | 1.57× | 21% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.5B USD | 100 | 33 | |
| 2 | 5.7B USD | 99 | 36 | |
| 3 | 350.8B JPY (≈$2.4B) | 99 | 83 | |
| 4 | 28.9B CNY (≈$4.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 5 | 2.45T CLP (≈$2.7B) | 99 | ||
| 569 | 4.1B USD | 4 | 24 | |
| 570 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 25.6B BRL (≈$4.6B) |
| 4 |
| 57 |
| 571 | 671.4B JPY (≈$4.6B) | 4 | 47 |
| 572 | 2.0B USD | 4 | 42 |
| 573 | 2.9B USD | 4 | 48 |
| 574 | 20.8B HKD (≈$2.7B) | 4 | 36 |
| 575 | 1.6B EUR (≈$1.8B) | 3 | 50 |
| 576 | 2.4B EUR (≈$2.7B) | 3 | 35 |
| 577 | 247.8B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 3 | 48 |