Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
How Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. stacks up
TNDM · against 406 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
53/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #190 of 407 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score35 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including TNDM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.9% vs peer median 6.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 8.2% vs peer median 5.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TNDM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TNDM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 413 reported | 7.9% | 5.3% | 57% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 226 reported | Not reported | 8.3% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 399 reported | 8.2% | 5.8% | 57% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TNDM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.9B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 99 | 96 | |
| 1 | 885M USD | 99 | 33 | |
| 1 | 15.6B DKK (≈$2.3B) | 99 | 96 | |
| 186 | 7.2B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 54 | 56 | |
| 186 | 110.9B JPY (≈$754M) | 54 | 59 | |
| 186 | 24.48T IDR (≈$1.5B) | 54 | 62 | |
| 190 | 4.9B CNY (≈$693M) | 53 | 70 | |
| 190 | 1.2B USD | 53 | 24 | |
| 192 | 8.9B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 52 | 42 | |
| 192 | 42.9B TWD (≈$1.3B) | 52 | 57 | |
| 192 | 204.5B JPY (≈$1.4B) | 52 | 71 | |
| 192 | 1.6B NZD (≈$946M) | 52 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score