Ranked #168 of 174 · scores higher than 3% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score
15 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including TMS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 3?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its earnings yield and book yield, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 98% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.1% vs peer median 7.9%
▼a higher price relative to book value (P/B): weaker than 91% of peers. Book yield: 31.4% vs peer median 79.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TMS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
TMS
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Earnings yieldHigher is better · 173 reported
-13.4%
8.9%
5%
60%
EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 40 reported
-0.4%
11.2%
21%
Context only
Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 104 reported
Not reported
7.7%
—
—
Context only
Book yieldHigher is better · 174 reported
32.2%
93.2%
3%
40%
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
