Ranked #126 of 170 · scores higher than 24% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
21 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including TMS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 15?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its return on equity and return on assets, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼a lower return on shareholders' equity: weaker than 88% of peers. Return on equity: 3.7% vs peer median 10.7%
▼a lower return on assets: weaker than 73% of peers. Return on assets: 0.6% vs peer median 1.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TMS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
TMS
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 155 reported
0.6%
8.1%
16%
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 38 reported
-3.7%
9.7%
22%
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 172 reported
0.6%
1.1%
33%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 168 reported
Not reported
10.4%
—
—
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 180 reported
39.7%
0.0%
75%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
