Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Trilogy Metals Inc.
How Trilogy Metals Inc. stacks up
TMQ · against 468 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
20/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #323 of 469 · scores higher than 30% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score55 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including TMQ · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 20?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -12.0% vs peer median 3.6%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -1.4% vs peer median 2.6%
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TMQ, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TMQ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 447 reported | -13.7% | 2.0% | 8% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 477 reported | Not reported | 6.4% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 114 reported | -1.4% | -0.8% | 47% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 448 reported | 30.6% | 71.5% | 15% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TMQScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score