Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to The Metals Royalty Company Inc.
How The Metals Royalty Company Inc. stacks up
TMCR · against 135 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
22/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #79 of 136 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score13 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including TMCR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 22?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -1.1% vs peer median 2.6%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 94% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.4% vs peer median 3.6%
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TMCR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TMCR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 122 reported | -16.6% | 1.3% | 13% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 148 reported | Not reported | 4.8% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 64 reported | -91.9% | -2.5% | 3% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 129 reported | 33.8% | 89.4% | 18% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TMCR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 224.2B CLP (≈$247M) | 100 | 47 | |
| 1 | 143M GBP (≈$186M) | 100 | 95 | |
| 3 | 2.0B HKD (≈$262M) | 98 | 53 | |
| 3 | 2.3B HKD (≈$288M) | 98 | 46 | |
| 3 | 408M AUD (≈$269M) | 98 | 73 | |
| 74 | 157M CAD (≈$115M) | 26 | 42 | |
| 77 | 328M SAR (≈$88M) | 24 | 8 | |
| 77 | 364.3B KRW (≈$262M) | 24 | 15 | |
| 79 | 2.2B CNY (≈$303M) | 22 | 46 | |
| 79 | 154M USD | 22 | 45 | |
| 81 | 1.5B CNY (≈$216M) | 21 | 12 | |
| 81 | 1.6B CNY (≈$230M) | 21 | 57 | |
| 81 | 3.1B NOK (≈$291M) | 21 | 23 | |
| 84 | 211M USD | 20 | 40 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score