Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TLX · against 329 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #269 of 330 · scores higher than 19% of peers · safety percentile 21
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)29 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including TLX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, which is weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TLX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 318 reported | 1.19× | 0.24× | 11% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 317 reported | 0.60 | 0.58 | 47% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 318 reported | 2.01× | 2.81× | 35% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 2.6B USD | 100 | 43 | |
| 3 | 3.6B USD | 99 | ||
| 4 | 1.8B USD | 99 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 265 | 4.8B USD | 22 | 52 | |
| 266 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 25.3B HKD (≈$3.2B) |
| 22 |
| 57 |
| 267 | 1.8B USD | 22 | 63 |
| 268 | 5.9B USD | 21 | 39 |
| 269 | 3.1B USD | 21 | 46 |
| 270 | 2.0B USD | 21 | 29 |
| 271 | 168.6B INR (≈$2.0B) | 20 | 63 |
| 272 | 2.6B USD | 18 | 32 |
| 273 | 4.4B AUD (≈$2.9B) | 18 | 51 |