Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TIPT · against 143 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Ranked #41 of 144 · scores higher than 72% of peers · safety percentile 77
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)17 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including TIPT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TIPT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 121 reported | 0.01× | 0.57× | 93% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 139 reported | 0.93 | 0.61 | 19% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 140 reported | 5.08× | 2.24× | 73% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.0B AUD (≈$674M) | 100 | ||
| 2 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 907M EUR (≈$998M) | 99 | ||
| 4 | 566M AUD (≈$374M) | 97 | 84 | |
| 5 | 21.21T IDR (≈$1.3B) | 97 | 93 | |
| 37 | 350M USD | 78 | ||
| 38 | 76.5B JPY (≈$520M) | 78 | 67 | |
| 39 | 2.7B CNY (≈$383M) | 78 | 23 | |
| 40 | 566M USD | 77 | 75 | |
| 41 | 659M USD | 77 | 72 | |
| 42 | 1.2B CAD (≈$850M) | 76 | 69 | |
| 43 | 9.50T IDR (≈$589M) | 76 | 54 | |
| 44 | 501M EUR (≈$551M) | 75 | 58 | |
| 45 | 706M USD | 74 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score