Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to TIM S.A.
How TIM S.A. stacks up
TIMB · against 81 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Profitability
85/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #21 of 82 · scores higher than 75% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score14 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including TIMB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 85?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly thanks to its operating margin, return on invested capital and return on assets, which are stronger than most Communication Services peers.
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 82% of peers. Return on assets: 7.6% vs peer median 2.7%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 85% of peers. Return on invested capital: 21.7% vs peer median 6.0%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 86% of peers. Operating margin: 23.8% vs peer median 8.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TIMB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TIMB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 74 reported | 21.7% | 9.7% | 79% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 82 reported | 23.8% | 17.5% | 73% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 79 reported | 7.6% | 5.0% | 72% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 76 reported | 17.3% | 10.9% | 63% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 83 reported | 54.6% | 55.1% | 48% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TIMB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.62T JPY (≈$11.0B) | 100 | 79 | |
| 2 | 4.2B GBP (≈$5.4B) | 99 | 68 | |
| 2 | 21.7B AUD (≈$14.4B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 3.9B GBP (≈$5.1B) | 99 | 68 | |
| 5 | 736.3B JPY (≈$5.0B) | 98 | 69 | |
| 17 | 1.03T INR (≈$12.3B) | 89 | 65 | |
| 18 | 6.1B USD | 88 | 72 | |
| 19 | 7.5B USD | 87 | 83 | |
| 19 | 10.8B USD | 87 | 59 | |
| 21 | 8.4B USD | 85 | 77 | |
| 22 | 9.6B AUD (≈$6.3B) | 84 | 59 | |
| 22 | 15.5B CAD (≈$11.3B) | 84 | 53 | |
| 22 | 111.0B SEK (≈$11.1B) | 84 | 57 | |
| 25 | 18.7B ILS (≈$5.0B) | 83 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score