Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to TIM S.A.
How TIM S.A. stacks up
TIMB · against 80 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Growth
63/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #36 of 81 · scores higher than 56% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score9 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including TIMB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 63?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Communication Services peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.6% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 68% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 7.3% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 74% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 38.4% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TIMB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TIMB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 82 reported | 4.6% | 5.8% | 47% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 60 reported | 38.4% | 13.4% | 75% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 81 reported | 7.3% | 6.0% | 56% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TIMB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 94.7B CNY (≈$13.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 35.4B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 3 | 46.5B CNY (≈$6.5B) | 96 | 42 | |
| 4 | 12.74T KRW (≈$9.2B) | 94 | 70 | |
| 5 | 46.4B BRL (≈$8.4B) | 92 | 72 | |
| 32 | 10.8B USD | 67 | 59 | |
| 33 | 5.8B EUR (≈$6.4B) | 66 | 59 | |
| 34 | 5.4B USD | 65 | 59 | |
| 35 | 3.9B GBP (≈$5.1B) | 64 | 68 | |
| 36 | 8.4B USD | 63 | 77 | |
| 37 | 6.15T KRW (≈$4.4B) | 61 | 64 | |
| 37 | 43.7B SAR (≈$11.8B) | 61 | 71 | |
| 37 | 4.8B EUR (≈$5.3B) | 61 | 47 | |
| 40 | 10.4B GBP (≈$13.6B) | 60 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score