Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TILE · against 408 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #246 of 409 · scores higher than 40% of peers · safety percentile 39
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)48 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including TILE · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TILE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 399 reported | 0.43× | 0.52× | 56% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 399 reported | 1.92 | 0.66 | 2% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 394 reported | 2.53× | 1.49× | 82% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 2 | 2.6B CAD (≈$1.9B) | 99 | 73 | |
| 3 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 98 | 82 | |
| 4 | 14.5B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 5 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 97 | 84 | |
| 242 | 11.2B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 39 | 49 | |
| 243 | 32.4B SEK (≈$3.2B) | 39 | 61 | |
| 244 | 2.4B USD | 39 | 65 | |
| 245 | 4.4B USD | 39 | 53 | |
| 246 | 2.2B USD | 39 | 64 | |
| 247 | 8.9B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 39 | 44 | |
| 248 | 6.0B MYR (≈$1.3B) | 39 | 54 | |
| 249 | 13.4B CNY (≈$1.9B) | 38 | 59 | |
| 250 | 81.8B THB (≈$2.3B) | 38 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score