Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Titan Mining Corporation
How Titan Mining Corporation stacks up
TII · against 202 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
34/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #102 of 203 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score11 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including TII · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 34?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -4.6% vs peer median 3.6%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.2% vs peer median 8.5%
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TII, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TII | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 185 reported | -4.6% | 1.4% | 24% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 215 reported | 7.2% | 5.0% | 55% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 79 reported | Not reported | -1.8% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 194 reported | 13.3% | 83.8% | 7% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TII| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 224.2B CLP (≈$247M) | 100 | 47 | |
| 1 | 143M GBP (≈$186M) | 100 | 95 | |
| 3 | 2.0B HKD (≈$262M) | 98 | 53 | |
| 3 | 2.3B HKD (≈$288M) | 98 | 46 | |
| 3 | 563M AUD (≈$371M) | 98 | 75 | |
| 99 | 353M USD | 37 | 28 | |
| 99 | 22.8B INR (≈$273M) | 37 | 44 | |
| 101 | 491M AUD (≈$324M) | 35 | 39 | |
| 102 | 2.2B CNY (≈$314M) | 34 | 53 | |
| 102 | 194M USD | 34 | 60 | |
| 104 | 446M SAR (≈$120M) | 32 | 26 | |
| 104 | 2.5B CNY (≈$353M) | 32 | 33 | |
| 106 | 2.5B CNY (≈$350M) | 30 | 39 | |
| 106 | 2.1B CNY (≈$288M) | 30 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score