Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TIGR · against 261 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #56 of 262 · scores higher than 78% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score31 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including TIGR · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its book yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | TIGR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 264 reported | 12.5% | 8.7% | 78% | 60% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 51 reported | Not reported | 10.9% | — | — | Context only |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 156 reported | Not reported | 7.9% | — | — | Context only |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 264 reported | 128.9% | 88.0% | 75% | 40% |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.2B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 3.3B HKD (≈$428M) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 6.0B HKD (≈$762M) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 20.6B TWD (≈$638M) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 3.4B HKD (≈$429M) | 98 | 64 | |
| 52 | 201.0B JPY (≈$1.4B) | 83 | ||
| 52 | 591M CHF (≈$679M) | 83 | 64 | |
| 56 | 8.0B HKD (≈$1.0B) | 82 | 63 | |
| 56 | 5.8B HKD (≈$743M) | 82 | ||
| 56 | 692M USD | 82 | 83 | |
| 59 | 151.6B JPY (≈$1.0B) | 81 | 68 | |
| 59 | 94.8B JPY (≈$644M) | 81 | ||
| 59 | 50.2B INR (≈$602M) | 81 | 60 | |
| 62 | 577M USD | 80 | 73 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score