Ranked #26 of 407 · scores higher than 93% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score
27 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including TIGR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 82?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly thanks to its book yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▲a lower price relative to book value (P/B): stronger than 81% of peers. Book yield: 128.9% vs peer median 79.5%
▲higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 81% of peers. Earnings yield: 12.5% vs peer median 7.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TIGR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
TIGR
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Earnings yieldHigher is better · 407 reported
12.5%
8.0%
91%
60%
EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 105 reported
Not reported
11.0%
—
—
Context only
Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 363 reported
Not reported
8.5%
—
—
Context only
Book yieldHigher is better · 401 reported
128.9%
72.6%
94%
40%
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
