Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Millicom International Cellular S.A.
How Millicom International Cellular S.A. stacks up
TIGO · against 65 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Profitability
83/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #22 of 66 · scores higher than 66% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score13 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including TIGO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 83?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly thanks to its operating margin, return on assets and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Communication Services peers.
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 76% of peers. Return on invested capital: 14.4% vs peer median 6.0%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 83% of peers. Return on assets: 7.6% vs peer median 2.7%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 91% of peers. Operating margin: 28.2% vs peer median 8.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TIGO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TIGO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 62 reported | 14.4% | 11.8% | 61% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 66 reported | 28.2% | 18.7% | 83% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 63 reported | 7.6% | 5.2% | 69% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 61 reported | 21.7% | 11.0% | 72% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 66 reported | 76.5% | 55.5% | 85% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TIGO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.62T JPY (≈$11.0B) | 100 | 79 | |
| 2 | 21.7B AUD (≈$14.4B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 3 | 3.54T JPY (≈$24.1B) | 98 | 77 | |
| 4 | 18.5B USD | 96 | 81 | |
| 5 | 1.08T JPY (≈$7.4B) | 95 | 67 | |
| 16 | 313.7B ZAR (≈$17.3B) | 87 | 70 | |
| 19 | 8.4B USD | 85 | 77 | |
| 20 | 15.5B CAD (≈$11.3B) | 84 | 53 | |
| 20 | 111.0B SEK (≈$11.1B) | 84 | 57 | |
| 22 | 13.0B USD | 83 | 66 | |
| 22 | 10.3B USD | 83 | 65 | |
| 24 | 118.3B HKD (≈$15.1B) | 82 | 70 | |
| 24 | 31.3B MYR (≈$6.9B) | 82 | 64 | |
| 26 | 25.1B USD | 81 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score