Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Tenet Healthcare Corporation
How Tenet Healthcare Corporation stacks up
THC · against 101 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
53/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #56 of 102 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score23 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including THC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.A mix: stronger earnings per share growth, but weaker 3-year revenue growth than most Healthcare peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 61% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 3.1% vs peer median 5.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.4% vs peer median 6.1%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 75% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 45.3% vs peer median 9.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = THC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | THC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 103 reported | 5.4% | 8.5% | 36% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 82 reported | 45.3% | 15.3% | 72% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 101 reported | 3.1% | 7.6% | 25% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around THC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.4B USD | 97 | 67 | |
| 2 | 16.5B USD | 96 | 37 | |
| 2 | 14.5B USD | 96 | 30 | |
| 4 | 22.8B USD | 95 | 38 | |
| 5 | 40.2B USD | 92 | 73 | |
| 52 | 15.8B EUR (≈$17.4B) | 55 | 47 | |
| 54 | 32.8B USD | 54 | 69 | |
| 54 | 28.6B USD | 54 | 60 | |
| 56 | 6.17T JPY (≈$42.0B) | 53 | 70 | |
| 56 | 21.5B USD | 53 | 60 | |
| 56 | 25.8B USD | 53 | 75 | |
| 59 | 80.2B CNY (≈$11.2B) | 52 | 76 | |
| 59 | 27.3B USD | 52 | 55 | |
| 61 | 975.0B INR (≈$11.7B) | 50 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score