Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Tecnoglass Holdings Inc.
How Tecnoglass Holdings Inc. stacks up
TGLS · against 420 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
60/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #170 of 421 · scores higher than 59% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score43 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including TGLS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 60?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -0.5% vs peer median 2.6%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 66% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.3% vs peer median 8.5%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 74% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.4% vs peer median 3.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TGLS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TGLS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 415 reported | 7.2% | 4.2% | 75% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 428 reported | 11.8% | 9.2% | 67% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 111 reported | -0.5% | 3.6% | 28% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 406 reported | 44.9% | 59.2% | 36% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TGLS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.39T ARS (≈$1.4B) | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 2.73T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 57 | |
| 2 | 2.6B USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 4 | 8.4B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 98 | 68 | |
| 4 | 19.9B ZAR (≈$1.1B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 167 | 1.4B EUR (≈$1.6B) | 61 | 69 | |
| 170 | 6.7B CNY (≈$941M) | 60 | 45 | |
| 170 | 3.2B USD | 60 | 64 | |
| 170 | 1.40T CLP (≈$1.5B) | 60 | 69 | |
| 170 | 1.8B USD | 60 | 57 | |
| 174 | 22.9B CNY (≈$3.2B) | 59 | 62 | |
| 174 | 12.2B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 59 | 64 | |
| 174 | 14.2B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 59 | 50 | |
| 174 | 9.1B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 59 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score