Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Teradyne, Inc.
How Teradyne, Inc. stacks up
TER · against 94 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
44/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #62 of 95 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score13 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including TER · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 44?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 1.9% vs peer median 2.7%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 3.6% vs peer median 4.2%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.7% vs peer median 2.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TER, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TER | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 95 reported | 2.7% | 2.9% | 46% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 93 reported | 3.6% | 4.8% | 38% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 68 reported | 1.9% | 3.0% | 31% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 91 reported | 7.5% | 15.3% | 27% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TER| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.5B USD | 97 | 56 | |
| 2 | 1.42T TWD (≈$44.0B) | 95 | 75 | |
| 3 | 3.89T JPY (≈$26.5B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 4 | 28.8B USD | 92 | 70 | |
| 4 | 35.5B USD | 92 | 80 | |
| 58 | 179.4B CNY (≈$25.1B) | 46 | 61 | |
| 58 | 11.47T JPY (≈$78.0B) | 46 | 62 | |
| 58 | 29.6B USD | 46 | 39 | |
| 61 | 35.1B EUR (≈$38.7B) | 45 | 60 | |
| 62 | 42.1B USD | 44 | 69 | |
| 63 | 161.4B CNY (≈$22.6B) | 43 | 43 | |
| 63 | 51.9B USD | 43 | 63 | |
| 65 | 32.8B USD | 41 | 70 | |
| 66 | 3.65T JPY (≈$24.8B) | 38 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score