Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Telecom Argentina S.A.
How Telecom Argentina S.A. stacks up
TEO · against 100 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Growth
92/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #4 of 101 · scores higher than 95% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score8 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including TEO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 92?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Communication Services peers.
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 76% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 11.4% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 97% of peers. Revenue growth: 53.0% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TEO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TEO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 102 reported | 53.0% | 4.5% | 98% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 63 reported | Not reported | 15.9% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 99 reported | 11.4% | 4.1% | 78% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TEO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 35.4B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 2 | 46.5B CNY (≈$6.5B) | 96 | 42 | |
| 3 | 3.2B USD | 95 | 57 | |
| 4 | 46.4B BRL (≈$8.4B) | 92 | 72 | |
| 4 | 4.5B USD | 92 | 63 | |
| 4 | 166.5B TRY (≈$5.0B) | 92 | 76 | |
| 7 | 7.0B USD | 91 | 44 | |
| 8 | 7.2B EUR (≈$7.9B) | 90 | 74 | |
| 9 | 3.8B USD | 88 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score