Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TEM · against 128 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #21 of 129 · scores higher than 84% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score20 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including TEM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
| Metric | TEM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 130 reported | 50.4% | 9.7% | 88% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 93 reported | Not reported | 21.3% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 124 reported | 58.3% | 10.8% | 93% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.8B USD | 99 | 31 | |
| 2 | 9.3B USD | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 14.87T KRW (≈$10.7B) | 97 | 76 | |
| 3 | 21.4B USD | 97 | 67 | |
| 3 | 7.3B USD | 97 | 74 | |
| 17 | 7.4B USD | 90 | 67 | |
| 18 | 68.9B HKD (≈$8.8B) | 89 | 67 | |
| 18 | 7.0B USD | 89 | 57 | |
| 18 | 13.8B USD | 89 | 54 | |
| 21 | 14.0B USD | 88 | 31 | |
| 22 | 27.5B NZD (≈$16.5B) | 87 | 69 | |
| 22 | 16.8B USD | 87 | 75 | |
| 22 | 20.0B AUD (≈$13.2B) | 87 | 77 | |
| 22 | 10.4B USD | 87 | 70 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score