Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TEAM · against 90 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #77 of 91 · scores higher than 16% of peers · safety percentile 14
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)16 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including TEAM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TEAM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 88 reported | 1.16× | 0.33× | 14% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 88 reported | 1.16 | 1.20 | 54% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 90 reported | 0.78× | 1.71× | 7% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 183.1B CNY (≈$25.6B) | 94 | 77 | |
| 2 | 40.5B USD | 91 | 75 | |
| 3 | 28.4B USD | 90 | 79 | |
| 4 | 11.47T JPY (≈$78.0B) | 89 | 62 | |
| 5 | 176.1B CNY (≈$24.7B) | 87 | 78 | |
| 73 | 42.3B USD | 16 | 46 | |
| 74 | 41.2B USD | 15 | 59 | |
| 75 | 72.9B CAD (≈$53.2B) | 15 | 51 | |
| 76 | 983.8B TWD (≈$30.5B) | 14 | 65 | |
| 77 | 48.4B USD | 14 | 36 | |
| 78 | 32.5B USD | 13 | 43 | |
| 79 | 52.7B USD | 12 | 61 | |
| 80 | 66.3B USD | 12 | 55 | |
| 81 | 351.9B CNY (≈$49.3B) | 11 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score