Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
How Teledyne Technologies Incorporated stacks up
TDY · against 496 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
56/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #200 of 497 · scores higher than 58% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score55 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including TDY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 56?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 4.9% vs peer median 4.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.7% vs peer median 2.7%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.2% vs peer median 2.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TDY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TDY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 495 reported | 3.1% | 1.9% | 66% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 499 reported | 4.9% | 4.0% | 56% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 465 reported | 3.7% | 3.3% | 53% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 490 reported | 35.5% | 22.1% | 67% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TDY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 5 | 662M USD | 98 | 57 | |
| 200 | 32.5B USD | 56 | 43 | |
| 200 | 20.2B USD | 56 | 50 | |
| 200 | 28.3B USD | 56 | 42 | |
| 200 | 1.6B USD | 56 | 44 | |
| 200 | 30.8B USD | 56 | 59 | |
| 200 | 4.2B USD | 56 | 48 | |
| 208 | 408M USD | 55 | 47 | |
| 208 | 32.8B USD | 55 | 66 | |
| 208 | 3.7B USD | 55 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score