Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ThredUp Inc.
How ThredUp Inc. stacks up
TDUP · against 427 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
9/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #369 of 428 · scores higher than 13% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score60 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including TDUP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 9?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -4.2% vs peer median 8.8%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -8.5% vs peer median 4.4%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 77% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 0.6% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TDUP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TDUP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 412 reported | -9.0% | 3.2% | 12% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 438 reported | -3.3% | 8.9% | 6% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 137 reported | 0.6% | 6.8% | 31% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 414 reported | 23.2% | 72.7% | 11% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TDUP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 130M EUR (≈$143M) | 100 | 46 | |
| 369 | 1.9B CNY (≈$262M) | 9 | 32 | |
| 369 | 11.2B TWD (≈$348M) | 9 | 13 | |
| 369 | 2.6B CNY (≈$369M) | 9 | 21 | |
| 369 | 2.2B CNY (≈$312M) | 9 | 45 | |
| 369 | 263M USD | 9 | 27 | |
| 374 | 1.9B HKD (≈$238M) | 6 | 50 | |
| 374 | 12.5B TWD (≈$386M) | 6 | 27 | |
| 374 | 511M SAR (≈$138M) | 6 | 32 | |
| 374 | 1.9B CNY (≈$259M) | 6 | 19 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score