Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TDUP · against 431 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #366 of 432 · scores higher than 15% of peers · safety percentile 20
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)37 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including TDUP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TDUP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 412 reported | 0.83× | 0.40× | 28% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 425 reported | 1.98 | 0.47 | 3% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 423 reported | 0.99× | 1.58× | 25% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 607M MYR (≈$134M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 2 | 49.3B JPY (≈$336M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 3 | 16.5B TWD (≈$513M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 4 | 38.1B JPY (≈$259M) | 99 | 88 | |
| 5 | 2.5B CNY (≈$357M) | 99 | 71 | |
| 362 | 2.1B CNY (≈$289M) | 22 | 31 | |
| 363 | 457M CAD (≈$334M) | 22 | 63 | |
| 364 | 256M USD | 20 | 29 | |
| 365 | 431M USD | 20 | 41 | |
| 366 | 263M USD | 20 | 27 | |
| 367 | 4.4B SEK (≈$444M) | 20 | 33 | |
| 368 | 52.8B JPY (≈$359M) | 18 | 47 | |
| 369 | 130M EUR (≈$143M) | 18 | 46 | |
| 370 | 216M AUD (≈$143M) | 18 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score