Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ThredUp Inc.
How ThredUp Inc. stacks up
TDUP · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
9/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #326 of 356 · scores higher than 8% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score31 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including TDUP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 9?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -5.9% vs peer median 8.6%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -11.7% vs peer median 4.3%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 77% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 0.8% vs peer median 6.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TDUP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TDUP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | -12.4% | 4.1% | 11% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | -4.6% | 8.3% | 6% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 325 reported | 0.8% | 5.2% | 19% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 31.9% | 36.2% | 46% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TDUP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 62M USD | 98 | 79 | |
| 3 | 7.9B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 3 | 6.3B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 5 | 400M USD | 96 | 59 | |
| 323 | 2.3B USD | 10 | 16 | |
| 323 | 1.4B USD | 10 | 28 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score