Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TCX · against 140 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #132 of 141 · scores higher than 6% of peers · safety percentile 5
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)12 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including TCX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TCX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 127 reported | Not reported | 0.23× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 131 reported | 0.85 | 0.76 | 42% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 141 reported | 0.57× | 1.97× | 5% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 2 | 129M USD | 100 | 48 | |
| 3 | 160.7B KRW (≈$116M) | 99 | 62 | |
| 4 | 147M USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 5 | 16.2B JPY (≈$110M) | 98 | 75 | |
| 128 | 244M EUR (≈$269M) | 11 | 42 | |
| 129 | 146M USD | 10 | 9 | |
| 130 | 1.8B CNY (≈$255M) | 8 | 11 | |
| 131 | 176M GBP (≈$228M) | 6 | 19 | |
| 132 | 136M USD | 5 | 26 | |
| 133 | 4.0B TWD (≈$126M) | 4 | 32 | |
| 134 | 105M CAD (≈$77M) | 3 | 37 | |
| 135 | 74M USD | 2 | 11 | |
| 136 | 172M USD | 2 | 33 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score