Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Trip.com Group Limited
How Trip.com Group Limited stacks up
TCOM · against 99 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
74/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #13 of 100 · scores higher than 86% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score9 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including TCOM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 74?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 9.4% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 93% of peers. Earnings yield: 12.5% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TCOM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TCOM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 98 reported | 12.5% | 4.6% | 95% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 101 reported | 9.4% | 7.4% | 68% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 57 reported | Not reported | 4.8% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 94 reported | 97.9% | 22.2% | 92% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TCOM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 219.5B CNY (≈$30.7B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 2 | 37.54T KRW (≈$27.0B) | 97 | 65 | |
| 2 | 150.1B HKD (≈$19.2B) | 97 | 79 | |
| 4 | 4.04T JPY (≈$27.5B) | 93 | 76 | |
| 5 | 31.01T KRW (≈$22.3B) | 91 | 59 | |
| 11 | 114.3B HKD (≈$14.6B) | 77 | 70 | |
| 12 | 2.26T JPY (≈$15.4B) | 76 | 69 | |
| 13 | 216.5B HKD (≈$27.7B) | 74 | 76 | |
| 13 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 74 | 91 | |
| 13 | 26.1B USD | 74 | 81 | |
| 16 | 34.3B EUR (≈$37.7B) | 73 | 36 | |
| 17 | 19.7B USD | 70 | 62 | |
| 17 | 24.8B USD | 70 | 64 | |
| 19 | 39.3B USD | 68 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score