Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Turtle Beach Corporation
How Turtle Beach Corporation stacks up
TBCH · against 397 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
65/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #156 of 398 · scores higher than 60% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score26 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including TBCH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 65?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -1.4% vs peer median 2.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 66% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.6% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 92% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 11.4% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TBCH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TBCH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 381 reported | -1.4% | 1.7% | 33% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 413 reported | 6.6% | 4.3% | 60% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 137 reported | 11.4% | 1.9% | 85% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 387 reported | 36.1% | 46.7% | 33% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TBCH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 156 | 11.0B TWD (≈$340M) | 65 | 43 | |
| 156 | 2.4B CNY (≈$332M) | 65 | 74 | |
| 156 | 57.6B JPY (≈$392M) | 65 | 70 | |
| 156 | 389M USD | 65 | 77 | |
| 156 | 283M USD | 65 | 34 | |
| 162 | 3.6B CNY (≈$499M) | 64 | 45 | |
| 162 | 6.1B TWD (≈$189M) | 64 | 67 | |
| 162 | 14.2B TWD (≈$439M) | 64 | 51 | |
| 162 | 7.5B TWD (≈$232M) | 64 | 38 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score