Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to TAT Technologies Ltd.
How TAT Technologies Ltd. stacks up
TATT · against 923 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
35/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #511 of 924 · scores higher than 43% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score77 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including TATT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 35?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 68% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 0.8% vs peer median 3.7%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 64% of peers. EBITDA yield: 5.2% vs peer median 6.9%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.3% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TATT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TATT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 923 reported | 4.1% | 3.0% | 56% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 934 reported | 5.0% | 6.5% | 44% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 192 reported | 1.4% | 3.2% | 38% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 928 reported | 37.5% | 56.1% | 30% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TATT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 895M EUR (≈$985M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 2.9B BRL (≈$517M) | 100 | 68 | |
| 511 | 7.2B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 35 | 31 | |
| 511 | 111.9B JPY (≈$761M) | 35 | 37 | |
| 511 | 6.9B CNY (≈$972M) | 35 | 46 | |
| 511 | 51.5B JPY (≈$350M) | 35 | 40 | |
| 511 | 504M USD | 35 | 72 | |
| 525 | 3.2B CNY (≈$448M) | 34 | 35 | |
| 525 | 826M USD | 34 | ||
| 525 | 850M USD | 34 | 32 | |
| 525 | 547M USD | 34 | 23 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score