Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TARA · against 166 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #31 of 167 · scores higher than 82% of peers · safety percentile 85
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)19 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including TARA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TARA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 150 reported | 0.02× | 0.21× | 86% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 160 reported | 1.49 | 0.61 | 17% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 163 reported | 10.97× | 2.96× | 84% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 2 | 165M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 3 | 261M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 4 | 284M AUD (≈$188M) | 98 | 36 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 98 | ||
| 27 | 110M USD | 88 | 54 | |
| 28 | 38.3B JPY (≈$260M) | 87 | 76 | |
| 29 | 6.5B TWD (≈$200M) | 86 | 76 | |
| 30 | 257M USD | 86 | 55 | |
| 31 | 142M USD | 85 | 45 | |
| 32 | 30.4B JPY (≈$206M) | 85 | 57 | |
| 33 | 170M USD | 84 | 35 | |
| 34 | 1.4B HKD (≈$180M) | 84 | 61 | |
| 35 | 100M CHF (≈$115M) | 84 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score