Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TAP-A · against 110 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #98 of 111 · scores higher than 11% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score10 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including TAP-A · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
| Metric | TAP-A | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 107 reported | -25.9% | 5.0% | 1% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 111 reported | 15.8% | 8.8% | 85% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 48 reported | 16.1% | 6.9% | 96% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 104 reported | 122.7% | 42.2% | 98% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34.8B HKD (≈$4.5B) | 96 | 75 | |
| 2 | 56.3B HKD (≈$7.2B) | 95 | 71 | |
| 3 | 7.2B USD | 92 | 72 | |
| 4 | 3.8B EUR (≈$4.2B) | 88 | 70 | |
| 4 | 5.5B USD | 88 | 84 | |
| 94 | 677.0B INR (≈$8.1B) | 23 | 58 | |
| 96 | 41.8B CNY (≈$5.8B) | 21 | 50 | |
| 96 | 7.6B USD | 21 | 45 | |
| 98 | 849.3B INR (≈$10.2B) | 20 | 56 | |
| 98 | 8.2B USD | 20 | 17 | |
| 100 | 1.52T JPY (≈$10.4B) | 19 | 24 | |
| 101 | 1.19T INR (≈$14.2B) | 18 | 60 | |
| 101 | 6.6B USD | 18 | 43 | |
| 103 | 58.1B CNY (≈$8.1B) | 17 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score