Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to AT&T Inc.
How AT&T Inc. stacks up
T · against 146 other Communication Services companies listed in US-listed
Growth
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #64 of 147 · scores higher than 56% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score20 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including T · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Communication Services peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 1.6% vs peer median 3.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.6% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 82% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 76.3% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = T, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | T | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 149 reported | 2.6% | 5.8% | 40% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 78 reported | 76.3% | 9.4% | 79% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 145 reported | 1.6% | 4.7% | 37% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around T| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.5B USD | 100 | 81 | |
| 2 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 71 | |
| 2 | 35.4B USD | 99 | 55 | |
| 4 | 648M USD | 98 | 26 | |
| 4 | 639M USD | 98 | 46 | |
| 61 | 1.0B USD | 65 | 39 | |
| 61 | 897M USD | 65 | 44 | |
| 61 | 5.4B USD | 65 | 59 | |
| 64 | 297M USD | 64 | 58 | |
| 64 | 146.6B USD | 64 | 63 | |
| 66 | 3.1B USD | 63 | 67 | |
| 66 | 8.4B USD | 63 | 77 | |
| 68 | 2.9B USD | 62 | 28 | |
| 68 | 142M USD | 62 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score