SWMR Technology

Swarmer, Inc

$9.22+1.10%

Price as of close on Nov 3, 2026 · Financials updated Sep 30, 2026

Basics

Sector: Technology
Industry: Software - Infrastructure
Country: United States
Market cap: 146.9M USD
Enterprise value: 27.8M USD
Full-time employees: 49

Overall health

Strength: lower risk than most peers: more short-term liquidity and less debt relative to equitylower risk: more liquidity and less debt vs equity
Drawback: less profitable than most peersless profitable than peers
Drawback: its shares are priced higher than most peers relative to what it earnspriced higher than peers for its earnings
Not enough data: growth

Would rank #1,210 of 1,612 fully scored technology companies (bottom 25%)

Partial overall score — 3/4 categories available.

See how it ranks against its peers

Worth knowing

Not profitable yet. Reported a loss in the 12 months to June 2026.
Swarmer reported a net loss over the last twelve months, so earnings-based measures can't show it as cheap.
Revenue is falling. Revenue fell 5.9% in the fiscal year to Dec 2025 vs the year before.
Swarmer's revenue fell 5.9% in the fiscal year to Dec 2025 vs the year before.

StockQuotient Score

37/ 100

Oct 5 37 → Nov 4 37

Valuation

Is the price right?

10/100

Weak

3/3 inputs reported · High confidence

Why

Weaker than most peers on:

▼ Earnings yield
▼ EBITDA yield
▼ FCF yield

Compare with peers

Behind the score

Sector-normalized EBITDA, earnings, and free cash flow yields.

Earnings yield-12.2%

SEC filings · 12 months to Jun 2026Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price30% base weight · Z-score -1.00Sector median: 0.0225 · MAD: 0.0225

EBITDA yield-55.0%

Yahoo Finance fallback · SEC enterprise value unavailable (debt or EBITDA not reported in standard form) · trailing 12 monthsNegative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price50% base weight · Z-score -1.17Sector median: 0.0423 · MAD: 0.0361

Free cash flow yield-9.9%

SEC filings · 12 months to Jun 2026 · operating cash flow − capital spendingNegative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price20% base weight · Z-score -1.00Sector median: 0.0274 · MAD: 0.0274

Other data (not scored)

Book yield21.2%

SEC filings · latest balance sheetReported valueInformational · 0% composite weightSector median: 0.3292 · MAD: 0.1754

Growth

Is it growing?

Insufficient data

Insufficient data: 1 of 3 inputs reported (at least 2 needed). We leave it blank rather than fill the gap with a made-up middle value.

Profitability

Does it earn well?

1/100

Weak

3/3 inputs reported · High confidence

Why

Weaker than most peers on:

▼ Operating margin
▼ ROA
▼ ROIC

Compare with peers

Behind the score

Return on invested capital, operating margin, and return on assets.

Operating margin-5179.2%

SEC filings · 12 months to Jun 2026Outlier capped at sector 5th/95th percentile33% base weight · Z-score -7.12Sector median: 0.0631 · MAD: 0.0710

Return on assets-53.0%

SEC filings · 12 months to Jun 2026Outlier capped at sector 5th/95th percentile33% base weight · Z-score -3.92Sector median: 0.0293 · MAD: 0.0362

Return on invested capital-205.7%

SEC filings · 12 months to Jun 2026Outlier capped at sector 5th/95th percentile33% base weight · Z-score -4.27Sector median: 0.0676 · MAD: 0.0857

Other data (not scored)

Gross margin48.6%

SEC filings · 12 months to Jun 2026Reported valueInformational · 0% composite weightSector median: 0.3343 · MAD: 0.1632

Return on equity-57.6%

SEC filings · 12 months to Jun 2026Outlier capped at sector 5th/95th percentileInformational · 0% composite weightSector median: 0.0753 · MAD: 0.0889

Risk

Debt, liquidity, price swings

Lower

Lower relative risk

2/3 inputs reported · Partial data

Why

Stronger than most peers on:

▲ Current ratio
▲ Debt / equity

Compare with peers

Behind the score

Relative to sector peers: 0 = lower relative risk · 1 = moderate · 2 = higher. Based on leverage, beta and liquidity.

BetaUnavailable

Missing · left out of the score · no sector data, so not countedNot counted · remaining weights rescaledSector median: 0.8710 · MAD: 0.3700

Current ratio12.28×

SEC filings · latest balance sheetOutlier capped at sector 5th/95th percentile33% base weight · Z-score 8.42Sector median: 1.8295 · MAD: 0.6848

Debt / equity0.01×

Yahoo Finance fallback · no standard SEC debt tagReported value33% base weight · Z-score 1.04Sector median: 0.2495 · MAD: 0.2270

Valuation, growth and profitability scores: higher is better. Risk: 0 is lower, 2 is higher. Risk is a relative proxy, not a bankruptcy probability. Scores depend on available sector peers.

Questions investors ask about Swarmer

Is Swarmer getting weaker?: A comparison of its latest SEC filing with the previous one isn't available yet. Its overall score is unchanged at 37/100 since Oct 28, 2026.
How is Swarmer valued vs its peers?: Priced higher than most peers relative to what it earns. Valuation scores 10/100 against 1,711 technology peers. Earnings yield -12.2% vs a peer median of 2.2% (weaker than 100% of peers).Earnings yield -12.2% vs peers 2.2% (weaker than 100% of peers).
Is Swarmer growing?: Insufficient data: 1 of 3 inputs reported (at least 2 needed).
How profitable is Swarmer?: Less profitable than most of its peers. Profitability scores 1/100 against 1,711 technology peers. Operating margin -5179.2% vs a peer median of 6.3% (weaker than 100% of peers).Operating margin -5179.2% vs peers 6.3% (weaker than 100% of peers).
How risky is Swarmer?: Lower risk relative to 1,711 technology peers, judged on debt, liquidity and share-price swings. Current ratio 12.28× vs a peer median of 1.83× (stronger than 95% of peers).Current ratio 12.28× vs peers 1.83× (stronger than 95% of peers). A relative measure, not a bankruptcy probability.

Industry valuation context

Industry: Software - Infrastructure · 71 companies

Valuations in Software - Infrastructure are above their usual range since 2016.

61% of months since 2016 were valued lower than now.
22% of companies are in the most expensive fifth of their own price-to-sales history.
Over 24 months, company values +19% and earnings +22% (medians): prices and earnings moved broadly together.
Median price-to-sales is +97% vs the whole market, against a usual +103%.

2016Shaded: most expensive fifth of its range2026

Financials

Detailed annual statements come from structured SEC filing data, which most US companies and some foreign filers provide. They aren’t available for this company yet.

SWMR price history

Price history is added with the daily price update and will appear after the next one.

Similar companies

Sector leaderboards

LEENO Industrial Inc.058470.KQ97/ 100

Transcend Information, Inc.2451.TW94/ 100

Joint Stock Company Kaspi.kzKSPI93/ 100

Bringing the fundamentals into focus…

Overall health

Strength: lower risk than most peers: more short-term liquidity and less debt relative to equitylower risk: more liquidity and less debt vs equity

Drawback: less profitable than most peersless profitable than peers

Drawback: its shares are priced higher than most peers relative to what it earnspriced higher than peers for its earnings

Not enough data: growth

Would rank #1,210 of 1,612 fully scored technology companies (bottom 25%)

Partial overall score — 3/4 categories available.

See how it ranks against its peers

Worth knowing

Not profitable yet. Reported a loss in the 12 months to June 2026.

Swarmer reported a net loss over the last twelve months, so earnings-based measures can't show it as cheap.

Revenue is falling. Revenue fell 5.9% in the fiscal year to Dec 2025 vs the year before.

Swarmer's revenue fell 5.9% in the fiscal year to Dec 2025 vs the year before.

Questions investors ask about Swarmer

Is Swarmer getting weaker?

A comparison of its latest SEC filing with the previous one isn't available yet. Its overall score is unchanged at 37/100 since Oct 28, 2026.

How is Swarmer valued vs its peers?

Priced higher than most peers relative to what it earns. Valuation scores 10/100 against 1,711 technology peers. Earnings yield -12.2% vs a peer median of 2.2% (weaker than 100% of peers).Earnings yield -12.2% vs peers 2.2% (weaker than 100% of peers).

Is Swarmer growing?

Insufficient data: 1 of 3 inputs reported (at least 2 needed).

How profitable is Swarmer?

Less profitable than most of its peers. Profitability scores 1/100 against 1,711 technology peers. Operating margin -5179.2% vs a peer median of 6.3% (weaker than 100% of peers).Operating margin -5179.2% vs peers 6.3% (weaker than 100% of peers).

How risky is Swarmer?

Lower risk relative to 1,711 technology peers, judged on debt, liquidity and share-price swings. Current ratio 12.28× vs a peer median of 1.83× (stronger than 95% of peers).Current ratio 12.28× vs peers 1.83× (stronger than 95% of peers). A relative measure, not a bankruptcy probability.