Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
How Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. stacks up
SWK · against 234 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
61/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #67 of 235 · scores higher than 70% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score32 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including SWK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 61?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.9% vs peer median 3.8%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 61% of peers. EBITDA yield: 8.8% vs peer median 6.9%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 77% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 8.2% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SWK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SWK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 224 reported | 3.9% | 3.9% | 52% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 235 reported | 8.8% | 6.9% | 73% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 120 reported | 8.2% | 3.7% | 92% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 221 reported | 56.7% | 26.6% | 78% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SWK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 2 | 21.8B EUR (≈$24.0B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 3 | 157.6B HKD (≈$20.2B) | 97 | 67 | |
| 3 | 91.3B HKD (≈$11.7B) | 97 | 73 | |
| 5 | 12.69T CLP (≈$14.0B) | 94 | 64 | |
| 67 | 2.60T JPY (≈$17.7B) | 61 | 36 | |
| 67 | 2.69T JPY (≈$18.3B) | 61 | 67 | |
| 67 | 24.0B EUR (≈$26.4B) | 61 | 52 | |
| 67 | 16.2B USD | 61 | 49 | |
| 67 | 15.8B USD | 61 | 45 | |
| 73 | 28.6B AUD (≈$18.9B) | 60 | 58 | |
| 73 | 17.5B USD | 60 | 44 | |
| 73 | 8.6B EUR (≈$9.5B) | 60 | 45 | |
| 76 | 16.48T KRW (≈$11.9B) | 59 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score