Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Latham Group, Inc.
How Latham Group, Inc. stacks up
SWIM · against 934 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
43/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #517 of 935 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score65 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including SWIM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 77% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.6% vs peer median 3.8%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.5% vs peer median 6.9%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.7% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SWIM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SWIM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 936 reported | 0.7% | 3.8% | 26% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 946 reported | 7.8% | 7.1% | 53% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 206 reported | 4.3% | 3.5% | 56% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 939 reported | 46.2% | 55.0% | 40% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SWIM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 895M EUR (≈$985M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 517 | 8.6B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 43 | 57 | |
| 517 | 5.8B NOK (≈$549M) | 43 | 56 | |
| 517 | 1.3B USD | 43 | 48 | |
| 517 | 613M USD | 43 | 24 | |
| 517 | 861M USD | 43 | 42 | |
| 526 | 45.3B TWD (≈$1.4B) | 42 | 40 | |
| 526 | 1.7B AUD (≈$1.1B) | 42 | 71 | |
| 526 | 551M USD | 42 | 41 | |
| 529 | 3.5B CNY (≈$485M) | 41 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score