Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.
How Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. stacks up
SWBI · against 951 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
71/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #299 of 952 · scores higher than 68% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score95 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including SWBI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 71?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.1% vs peer median 3.8%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 67% of peers. EBITDA yield: 9.9% vs peer median 6.9%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 90% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 13.9% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SWBI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SWBI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 955 reported | 4.2% | 3.4% | 55% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 963 reported | 9.9% | 6.9% | 63% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 202 reported | 13.9% | 3.6% | 86% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 959 reported | 63.3% | 55.3% | 57% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SWBI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 895M EUR (≈$985M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 2.9B BRL (≈$517M) | 100 | 68 | |
| 299 | 61.8B JPY (≈$421M) | 71 | 82 | |
| 299 | 5.3B CNY (≈$747M) | 71 | 53 | |
| 299 | 101.5B JPY (≈$690M) | 71 | 59 | |
| 299 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 71 | 61 | |
| 299 | 591M USD | 71 | 73 | |
| 307 | 5.5B CNY (≈$765M) | 70 | 63 | |
| 307 | 4.7B CNY (≈$652M) | 70 | 63 | |
| 307 | 18.8B TWD (≈$582M) | 70 | 63 | |
| 307 | 2.8B HKD (≈$359M) | 70 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score